Pages

Oct 11, 2010

Are Google's Driverless Cars Legal?

Google's project to design driverless vehicles raised several questions about the future of driving. But it also raised a more topical question: Are Google's heavily-modified driverless vehicle prototypes even legal? We found out.

Researchers have been working on driverless vehicles since the late 1970s; European governments spent nearly $1 billion in the 1980s and '90s on automated vehicles, including a Mercedes sedan that passed other vehicles on the German autobahn in 1995 at speeds of 110 mph without human input.

In revealing its project Sunday, Google said it had racked up nearly 140,000 miles in its vehicles on public roads, including the Pacific Coast Highway and famous spots such as San Francisco's twisty Lombard Street. The computing giant says it alerted local law enforcement officials whenever testing took place.

According to California officials, there are no laws that would bar Google from testing such models, as long as there's a human behind the wheel who would be responsible should something go wrong. Google says its test vehicles always have at least three passengers: a driver behind the wheel and two technicians to monitor the software and systems.

Google's software "would be just a big step up from cruise control," said Mike Marando, a spokesman for the California Department of Motor Vehicles. "If the vehicle goes too fast, or strays across the line, the human would be responsible for operating the car legally."

And sadly, modern vehicles have been replacing drivers with technology for years. Adaptive cruise control is standard on many luxury models; Ford and Lexus vehicles can parallel park on their own with only brake inputs from the driver, and more advanced systems engage braking controls automatically if they sense a crash is imminent.

For now, there's no legal limits keeping Google or other researchers from developing their cars on public roads as long as there's a human behind the wheel. Going beyond that will make the legal questions as challenging as the technical ones.

54 comments:

  1. ....Sounds pretty unsafe to me. What the hell is the human going to do, fight against the robot? Teehee

    ReplyDelete
  2. this is gonna be crazy .... skynet anyone?

    ReplyDelete
  3. About time, is all I have to say! I have more important things to do then deal with ignorant/selfish motorists.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I see NOTHING sad about this...There are a shitload of people on the roads that shouldn't be allowed near cars at all. The google cars are safer now than a good number of em.

    ReplyDelete
  5. i had a dream i invented a driverless car

    ReplyDelete
  6. Sounds pretty damn awesome!
    Cant wait for iRobot to be real :P

    ReplyDelete
  7. Going around without the need to drive, just my dream xD

    ReplyDelete
  8. so if the car is driving then i can get drunk?

    ReplyDelete
  9. I've always wondered about the idea of driverless cars. Imagine a taxi service where an empty car stops in front of you and then you get in the couch in the front, whereupon it'll take you to wherever you need to go.

    ReplyDelete
  10. like mere laws could restrict google anyway :P

    ReplyDelete
  11. thats really crazy i love it and i want one

    ReplyDelete
  12. For me a car that can drive itself will not beat the fun of driving a manual transmission. For whether or not it is legal I believe if a legal driver is in the driver seat for a manual override then yes.

    ReplyDelete
  13. cool idea, but id rather see it come from someone else other than google

    ReplyDelete
  14. Probably unsafe for now IMO, perhaps in the future once the technology is stabilized. I wouldn't want to be in one thats for sure.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Had no idea this existed, but i honestly don't think it would work. I WANT FLYING CARS MORE THAN AUTOMATICS.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Saw this on TV. Knowing google, this car will be flawless and it will be the next big thing. Check out my blog

    ReplyDelete
  17. the future. it'll eventually be ridiculous to say that you have to be awake while driving a car...

    ReplyDelete
  18. I see no problems with it as long as there is a human and fail safe in the car.

    ReplyDelete
  19. thats so cool, i want one of those cars

    ReplyDelete
  20. Well it still be a good idea to have people behind the wheel just in case. Good show Google.

    http://quarterqwerty.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
  21. I trust machines a lot more than I trust the average human motorist. I don't consider this misanthropic, since we shouldn't all be driving cars everywhere in the first place; it's an amazingly inefficient method of transportation that is bound to result in problems and accidents. automating it makes more sense, but it would be even better if we just had public transportation like every other civilized country.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Yeah, who is liable in a crash???

    ReplyDelete
  23. I buy cars based on looks and performance. Why would you want to get a car you don't have to drive? Driving is too fun.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I buy cars based on looks and performance. Why would you want to get a car you don't have to drive? Driving is too fun.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Man That's awesome! Google is the best. It deserves to be an adjective. Replacement for awesome perhaps?

    ReplyDelete
  26. srry but i dont agree

    ReplyDelete
  27. good. this needs to happen, not be stopped by inane laws

    ReplyDelete
  28. well, let's just hope they don't get a weird Y2K-like bug going on e__e

    ReplyDelete
  29. awesome read, thanks for sharing! supporting :)

    ReplyDelete
  30. now when you wreck i want the foam from demolition man lol

    ReplyDelete
  31. If you get pulled over who gets the ticket?

    ReplyDelete
  32. Even when these kinds of cars become super-common, I'm gonna be afraid to own one

    ReplyDelete
  33. I don't even care, i want these cars. btw this sort of thing is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to "Zero Vision" the original idea behind a 0 road toll worldwide.. look into it. i think thats its called lul.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Sweet tech blog. Driverless cars sounds pretty cool. Imagine how easy it would be to transport goods across the country.

    ReplyDelete
  35. If the cars by themselves drive better than 50% of the assholes out there, then I approve of this.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Thats the future for sure.. just a question of how soon it will be a reality for consumers.

    ReplyDelete
  37. :S theres nothing sad about this

    ReplyDelete
  38. dude, this is just crazy lol someone is gonna get hurt

    ReplyDelete
  39. I'm sure that a statistical analysis could be made. Who knows, these auto-cars might even be more reliable than human drivers.

    ReplyDelete
  40. They be climbin in yo windows next and doing some transformer shhiitttt

    ReplyDelete
  41. seems like they should start off wit something a little more low risk like a golf cart

    ReplyDelete
  42. I thought exactly the same. Robot cars dont sound very safe to me. :S

    ReplyDelete
  43. I eagerly await my 6 million dollar nuclear self navigating vehicle.

    ReplyDelete
  44. google is cool and all but this is a bit too fucking much haa

    ReplyDelete